A Balancing Act for Differential Gaging
Differential gaging measures using two devices, which has advantages over standard, comparative measurements using a single sensing head. These include the ability to measure size without regard to position.
Share




The differential gaging process uses two sensing devices and combines the results into one measurement. The measured dimension is the change in the position of the two sensing components.
Differential gaging has advantages over standard, comparative measurements using a single sensing head against a fixed reference surface. These include the measurement of size without regard to position (see Figure 1). When the two gage heads are in line and in an opposed position, the sensed dimension will be the change in the separation of the two gage tips; in this case, the size of the part. When measuring in this manner, the staging of the part does not become part of the measurement loop. The platen in a differential system just places the part between transducers.
There are a number of measuring systems available that can provide differential gaging, including air and electronic gaging. Air gaging is probably the most common since every two-jet air plug and air ring utilizes the differential gaging principle. Most air gages measure back-pressure that builds up in the system when the tooling is placed in close proximity to a workpiece; this results in higher air pressure, which the gage comparator converts into a dimensional value. Thus, as the plug fits into the part, it is the combination of both jets that represents the diameter of the part without regard to where in the part the plug happens to be.
The same is true with electronic probes. In this case, though, the probes are combined electronically to provide the differential measurement. Differential gaging using both air and electronic probes is used in a wide variety of applications that include measurement of form on angles, tapers and shafts without regard to the part dimensions. Also, the concentricity of two shaft diameters, comparison of a workpiece to a master, match gaging and, finally, checking the parallelism of a workpiece and its support surface are all applications of this technique.
If there is an issue with differential gaging, it is the fact that there are basically two sensing devices, whether it be two air jets combined in a single circuit or two electronic probes combined electronically in some type of amplifier system. This issue is that there are two sensors; thus, in theory, there is a potential for twice the error when the sensors are combined. For air gaging, this error is often referred to as a balance error. With electronic probes, especially when used for extremely high tolerance applications, the error is referred to as a tracking error. However, in either case, one would expect to observe that movement in one sensor is the same movement in the other.
With air gaging, using two air jets combined differentially in an air plug, checking this balance error is something that should be done as part of an annual tooling review. If an air plug is used as handheld tooling, wear will often be equal on all parts of the diameter. However, if the air plug is mounted on a holder with the jets vertical, there could be more wear on one jet sensor than the other.
The test performed is pretty simple. Ensure the air plug is mounted in its holder with the jets at the 0-degree and the 180-degree position. Then, place the master on the tooling and zero out the display. The test is performed by gently but firmly lifting the master ring, causing the ring to rest against the bottom of the body of the air tooling. Normally, two-jet air plugs automatically balance themselves when one of the jets is closer to the workpiece than the other — as is the case here, where the master is allowed to rest on the upper jet. But if one jet or orifice is damaged or worn, this test will demonstrate the gage’s inability to maintain that balance. Manufacturers of air tooling have tolerances on the balance error, and the air plug can be compared to the acceptable limits.
A combination of electronic probes used in differential gaging often has more measuring range and is sometimes used in higher-resolution applications. This combination error can be referred to as a balance error but is more often referred to as a tracking error since it is easier to plot the measuring curves of each probe and the combination. To check for this error, the process is a little more complicated, but with the correct tools, it is pretty easy.
The test here involves placing both sensors on the calibrated reference, moving it through various points along the probe’s travel and observing the difference. The moving reference surface could be a very precise micro calibrator or a set of gage blocks that represent points within the measuring range of the probes. Start by placing the probes on the reference at a point close to their electronic zero, electronically zero out the probes and display each probe and the combination on the amplifier. Then, move the probes through their range, recording the values at the designated steps. When completed, you will be able to determine the error of each probe and potentially any variance that would affect your differential measurement.
Related Content
How to Choose the Correct Fixed-Body Plug Gaging Solution
The two types of fixed-body plug gages are both accurate, fast and easy to use. Consider these factors when selecting one for your gaging application.
Read MoreThe Link Between CNC Process Control and Powertrain Warranties
Ever since inventing the touch-trigger probe in 1972, Sir David McMurtry and his company Renishaw have been focused on achieving process control over its own manufacturing operations. That journey has had sweeping consequences for manufacturing at large.
Read MoreMarathon Precision’s Engineering Playground: One Shop’s Secret to Sustaining High Tech, Low-Volume and High Morale
Half an airplane on the wall, a ten-foot metal dragon, and a full-blown recording studio might not scream “manufacturing efficiency,” yet Marathon Precision proves otherwise. Here’s how forging, complex CNC operations and staff-driven creative projects combine to fuel the shop’s productivity and profitability.
Read MoreRethink Quality Control to Increase Productivity, Decrease Scrap
Verifying parts is essential to documenting quality, and there are a few best practices that can make the quality control process more efficient.
Read MoreRead Next
Machine Shop MBA
Making Chips and 91ÊÓÆµÍøÕ¾ÎÛ are teaming up for a new podcast series called Machine Shop MBA—designed to help manufacturers measure their success against the industry’s best. Through the lens of the Top Shops benchmarking program, the series explores the KPIs that set high-performing shops apart, from machine utilization and first-pass yield to employee engagement and revenue per employee.
Read MoreAMRs Are Moving Into Manufacturing: 4 Considerations for Implementation
AMRs can provide a flexible, easy-to-use automation platform so long as manufacturers choose a suitable task and prepare their facilities.
Read MoreLast Chance! 2025 Top Shops Benchmarking Survey Still Open Through April 30
Don’t miss out! 91ÊÓÆµÍøÕ¾ÎÛ's Top Shops Benchmarking Survey is still open — but not for long. This is your last chance to a receive free, customized benchmarking report that includes actionable feedback across several shopfloor and business metrics.
Read More